N.K.JAIN
Noor Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
Gulam Rasool through L. Rs. (17) – Respondent
2. The brief facts that give rise to this appeal as alleged by the appellants are that with regard to mine no. 36 Chak Dangari in town Makarana measuring 230 x 70 ft. of which a Patta was granted to the plaintiff Noor Mohammed by erstwhile Jodhpur Stale on 12.9.1938, It was alleged that rest of the plaintiffs Nizamudin and Bilaludin had also ownership right over the said mine and were in possession through the patta which was executed in the name of the plaintiff Noor Mohammed. It was also alleged that half of the portion of mine in the north side measuring 115 x 70 ft. fell in share of Gulam Mustafa s/o Chotu in partition marked as A B C D in the map and the other portion marked as A B E F in the map which was in their possession. It was also alleged that the plaintiff No. 1 Noor Mohammed took adjoining mine no, 36A situated in the west side of the mine no. 36 vide lease deed dt. 31.3.78 measuring 230 x 60 ft. on yearly basis. The plaintiff Noor Mohammed agreed to sale 1/4 of the mine no. 36 measuring 57 x 70 ft. in favour of late U
(1) Amrik Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration) (1971 (3) SCC - 215)
(3) Bhanwarlal vs. Bholi Bai (AIR 1972 Raj. - 203)
(8) Hedair vs. Jagta (AIR 1985 H.P. 30)
(9) Lata vs. Lalkhan & Ors. (AIR 1990 Raj. 17).
(11) Smt. Pemi Bai vs. Shankati Bai (1981 RLW-125)
(12) Girdharilal Vs. Laxmi Narain (AIR 1990 Raj. - 15)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.