M.C.JAIN, Y.R.MEENA
Regional Transport Authority, Jodhpur Region – Appellant
Versus
Sita Ram (162) – Respondent
2. Relevant facts may be summarised thus. Certain petitioner-respondents were existing operators and they applied for the renewal of their non-temporary stage carriage permits under which they were plying their vehicles. Other petitioner-respondents applied for non-temporary stage carriage permit for the first time after coming into force of the New Act. Existing permits were renewed and new permits were granted by the Regional Transport Authorities imposing pre-emptory condition for replacing their vehicle
(2) M/s Gurcharan Singh Baldeo Singh vs. Yashwant Singh (AIR 1992 SC 180)
(7) Mahadeolal Kanodia v. The Administrator General of West Bengal (AIR 1960 SC 936
(11) Chief Inspector of Mines vs. Karam Chand Thapar (AIR 1961 SC 838)
(12) Neel Niranjan Majumdar vs. State of West Bengal (AIR 1972 SC 2066)
(13) MamUshwar Prasad vs. Kanhaiyalal (AIR 1975 SC 907 at page 909 p. 7)
(18) Sree Gajanana Motor Transport Co. Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka (AIR 1977 SC 418 p. 420)
(19) Ram Chandra vs. State of Orissa (AIR 1956 SC 298 p. 305 )
(20) V.C.K. Bus Service vs. R.T. Authority (AIR 1957 SC 489 at page 492 para 10)
(21) Union of India vs. J.N. Sinha (AIR 1991 SC 40 at page 42 para 7)
(1) Chandmal v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal (1991(1) RLR 627=AIR 1991 Raj. 95)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.