N.K.JAIN
Guiam Rasool – Appellant
Versus
Mariyam – Respondent
2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff-non-petitioner no. 1 Mari yam filed a suit on 20.9.72 for declaration and possession of the disputed land Nohra, a well and building situated at Pali against the defendant-non-petitioner no. 2 to 5 and also claimed damages for Rs. 5100/. It was alleged that she purchased the disputed Nohra from the defendant no. 4 Smt. Pani Bai and defendant no. 5 Satya Narain with the consideration of Rs. 25,000/on 30.4. 1971 and the registered deed was executed on 6.5.71 at Jodhpur. The defendant no. 2 expired and his legal representatives no. 3 to 9 were taken on record. During the pendency of the suit, the defendants no. 4 and 5 had sold the disputed Nohra to the defendant no. 6 Gulam Rasool, the present petitioner for Rs. 40,000/ on 29.8. 72 by a registered sale deed, the plaintiff on 25.5.78 sought an amendment to add para no. 5A to the effect that sale is void in favour of defendant no. 6 as the same is hit by doctrine of lispendence. The petitioner was added as defendant no. 6. Durin
(1) Samar Singh vs. Kedarnath (AIR 1987 SC 1926)
(4) M.K. Shetty vs. M.V. Laxrainarain Rao (AIR 1972 SC 2299)
(9) Jugraj Singh vs. Jaswant Singh (AIR 1971 SC 761)
(14) Nagubai Amal vs. B. Smmarao (AIR 1956 SC 593)
(10) Babu Lal vs. Kanhaiyalal (RLW 1974-570)
(11) Surajbahadur vs. Mahadev(l963 RLW 497)
(12) Bhagwan Das vs. Goswami Brijesh Kumari (AIR 1983 Raj 3)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.