RAJESH BALIA
Bhim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bakhtawar Lal (40) – Respondent
(2) The facts in brief are that House No. 221 in Ward No. 9 situated at Udaipur was an ancestral property of plaintiff-appellant Padam Singh and the defendants Bakhtawar Lal son of Gopal Lal and Shanti Lal son of Bakhtawar Lal. On a partition, the ground floor became the property of defendants and the upper storey consisting of first floor and second floor became the property of plaintiff Padam Singh. As a result of this partition of one property, plaintiff became entitled to verticle support of walls of building on ground floor. It appears that the building was in dilapidated condition, there was a notice from the Municipal Council, Udaipur for demolishing of the house. As a result of which the first and second floors belonging to the plaintiffs were demolished, according to plaintiffs in 1950 and accordin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.