Honble ISRANI, J.—The above mentioned writ petitions are decided by one single order, since same points of law have been raised in each of the writ petitions.

(2) So far as the ten writ petitions filed against the judgment dated April 23,1991, passed by the learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer, are concerned, the facts of Writ Petition No. 3059 of 1991 (Birdha vs. Board of Revenue & Others) are mentioned hereunder: It has been stated that on behalf of respondent No.4, temple of idol of Shri Srinathji/Goverdhan Nathji, situated at Nathdwara, District Udaipur city, a suit was filed, regarding land comprised in Khasra No.9, situated in Village Kankara, Tehsil Pipalda, which stood in "muafi" and "khudkasht" of the said idol. It was stated in the plaint that, on the date of resumption, the above mentioned land was entered as khudkast"land in the settlement record and the said idols of Shri Srinathji/Goverdhanji have become khatedar tenant of the same. It was further stated in the plaint that the idol was a perpetual minor and that the petitioner and others could not acquire khatedari rights in the lands of the idol. The Revenue Officers had unauthorisedly and without giving any information to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document