SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Raj) 423

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble R.S. Verma, J.
Brijesh Sharma - Appellant
Versus
District Judge, Jaipur District Jaipur & Another - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6495 of 1993
Decided On : December 09, 1993

Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Mittal, for Petitioner Paker Farooq, for the respondents

Headnote:(a) Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986, Rule 10 (2) and Constitution of India Art. 14, 16 and 51A — Short listing of candidates — Where the number of candidates are 50 times of the post notified — Short listing not amounting to amendment in Rules. (Para 9)(b) Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986, Rule 10 (2) and Constitution of India, Art. 14, 16 and 51-A — Criteria for shortlisting in Circular and Notification — Preference to candidates having higher qualifications over those having I class Higher Secondary Pass — This is not having nexus With object to achieve — Circular and Notification to that extent quashed. (Para 15)

       

Honble VERMA, J.—By the consent of both the sides the matter has been heard for final disposal at the admission stage. The controversy raised before me is a short one. Brijesh Sharma, the petitioner before me, is a citizen of India. He was born on 24.09.1975, and passed Secondary Examination, 1993, from the Board of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Ajmer in Second Division.

(2). As many as eight vacancies of Lower Division Clerks are lying vacant in the Court of District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur. The recruitments to these vacancies is governed by the Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1986 (for short the Rules). Rule 10 (2) of the said Rules lays down academic qualification for direct recruitment to the general cadre of Lower Division Clerks. This rule reads as follows : —

"10(2) ; A candidate for direct recruitment to the general cadre must have passed to the Secondary Examination of the Rajasthan Board of Secondary Education or any Examination of an University or Board recognised as equivalent thereto by the Government, or any higher examination, and must in addition possess a good knowledge of Hindi written in Devanagri Script.

Provided that the above conditions shall not apply to the physically handicapped persons who shall be eligible for recruitment and appointment to the earmarked and reserved posts in accordance with the Rajasthan Employment of the Physically Handicapped Rules, 1976 and orders of the Government issued from time to time in this behalf."

(3). Some difficulty was being faced by the District Judges in making recruitment to the posts of Lower Division Clerks, because large number of applications were being received. Obviously the population explosion in the Country has resulted in this situation. To tackle the situation, Registrar, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, issued Circular No. G/I/A4(i) (a) 85/93/1714 dated 16.8.1993. The relevant paragraphs of this Circular read as follows : —

"In case of receipt of large number of applications with a view to minimise the difficulties in holding the test, the method of short listing of candidates may be adopted as has been decided in 1989 (2) RLR (II) in following manner: —

If applications received are more than fifty (50) times of the vacancies advertised, the candidates who have passed Higher Secondary in 1st Division or B.A./B.Sc./ B.Com./M.A./M.Sc./M.Com./LL.B. in any division may only be allowed to participate in the test. Reference be made to the aforesaid Judgment. Notification of the recruitment examination should contain the method of short listing of the candidates alongwith other usual particulars. This may kindly be given priority."

(4). In pursuance to the aforesaid Circular, District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur, issued Notification (Annexure 2), inviting applications from eligible candidates for recruitment on the post of Lower Division Clerks. Following note was appended to the Notification : —

(5). The petitioner, though having passed Secondary Examination in Second Division was not considered eligible to appear at the recruitment test to be held by the District Judge," Jaipur District, Jaipur, because of the aforesaid note, read with circular Annexure 4, the relevant portion of which has already been reproduced above.

(6). Aggrieved, the petitioner has come to this Court and has inter alia prayed that Annexure 2 and 4 may be declared unconstitutional and may be quashed inasmuch as they are in conflict with the provisions of the Rules and are also violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition is opposed on behalf of the respondents, who contend that the Circular referred to above and the Notification issued by District Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur, is perfectly constitutional and may not be quashed.

(7). I have heard learned counsel for the parties at great length and have perused the material placed on record before me.

(8). The first question, which falls for consideration of this Court is wh

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top