SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 173

M.P.SINGH, G.C.MITTAL
State – Appellant
Versus
Babul Lal Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.M. Saxena, Addl. Govt. Advocate, for State Virendra Dangi, for Respondent

Honble SINGH, J. — Babu Lal Sharma, the petitioner- respondent, was appointed by the Additional Registrar Rajasthan High Court, Bench at Jaipur on 4-2-1987 with effect from 17-4- 1987 as a Class-IV Employee on daily wages. This appointment was only for a period of 60 days. He was paid Rs. 11/-per day. The appointment was extended on 3.4.1987 for another period of 60 days at the rate of Rs. 20/- per day. Subsequently, by the order dated 16-8-1987, he was made a regular Class-IV Employee in the pay scale of Rs. 700-850.

(2). At times, the respondent was required to work as a Carpenter as well. The pay scale of the Carpenter initially was Rs. 850- 1520 but was subsequently revised to Rs. 910-1530. So he claimed, that since he has been working as a Carpenter, he should be paid the grade payable to a regular Carpenter.

(3). Asserting his claim he made a representation on 15-1-1990 to the Registrar, High Court. It was rejected vide order dated 13.08.1990. On his further representation he was informed by the Registrar on 19.6.1991 that the State Government did not agree for the sanction of the post of a Carpenter at Rajasthan High Court. Accordingly he could not be appointed as a regular Ca

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top