M.P.SINGH, G.C.MITTAL
State – Appellant
Versus
Babul Lal Sharma – Respondent
(2). At times, the respondent was required to work as a Carpenter as well. The pay scale of the Carpenter initially was Rs. 850- 1520 but was subsequently revised to Rs. 910-1530. So he claimed, that since he has been working as a Carpenter, he should be paid the grade payable to a regular Carpenter.
(3). Asserting his claim he made a representation on 15-1-1990 to the Registrar, High Court. It was rejected vide order dated 13.08.1990. On his further representation he was informed by the Registrar on 19.6.1991 that the State Government did not agree for the sanction of the post of a Carpenter at Rajasthan High Court. Accordingly he could not be appointed as a regular Ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.