SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 144

V.K.SINGHAL, ARUN MADAN
Kanwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Sharma, for Petitioner

Honble MADAN, J. — The aforesaid writ petitions have come up before us for hearing on a reference by the learned Single Judge of this court vide his order dated the 27th of October, 1993, when the learned Single Judge after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner at the admission stage was pleased to observe as under : —

"This writ petition involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of proviso to Rule 5(1) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules 1965. Such writ petition can be heard by a Division Bench. Put up this case before Division Bench.

sd/----------------

(G.S.SINGHVI), J."

(2). It is in these circumstances that the aforesaid writ petitions have been put up before us.

(3). Since both the writ petitions involve a common question of law, they are being disposed of by a common order which would be applicable to both the matters. The only question of law with which we are concerned in the present writ petitions is challenge to the constitutional validity of proviso to Rule 5(1) of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the CCS (Temporary Service) Rules) and the question of law to be decided is as under :





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top