SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 207

R.R.YADAV
Khema – Appellant
Versus
Shri Bhagwan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R. Bhandari, for Appellants B.N. Kalla, for Respondents

Honble YADAV, J. — This second appeal has been filed under Section 100 CPC by defendant-appellants against the judgment and decree dated 30.6.1980 passed by learned District Judge, Bhilwara in Civil Appeal No. 91 of 1977 confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.10.1977 passed by the learned Civil Judge,Bhilwara in Original Civil Suit No. 34 of 1971- Bhilwara & another v/s Khema & Others.

(2). It is pertinent to mention that the learned District Judge, Bhilwara by his impugned judgment and decree had allowed the cross objections filed by plaintiff-respondent Bhagwana and his mother Nani under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC modifying the decree passed by the learned Civil Judge decreeing the restoration of the possession by ejecting the defendant-appellants No. 1 to 3 and defendant-respondent No.4.

(3). Civil Suit was filed by Shri Bhagwana and his mother Smt. Nani plaintiff-respondents No.l arid 2 on the ground inter-alia that the land in dispute is an ancestral property and they are members of the joint Hindu family and they are governed by Mitakshara Scheol of Hindu Law. According to the plaint allegation, plaintiff No;l Bhagwana is a. minor coparcener while his mother plaintiff No. 2 Nani















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top