R.R.YADAV
Khema – Appellant
Versus
Shri Bhagwan – Respondent
(2). It is pertinent to mention that the learned District Judge, Bhilwara by his impugned judgment and decree had allowed the cross objections filed by plaintiff-respondent Bhagwana and his mother Nani under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC modifying the decree passed by the learned Civil Judge decreeing the restoration of the possession by ejecting the defendant-appellants No. 1 to 3 and defendant-respondent No.4.
(3). Civil Suit was filed by Shri Bhagwana and his mother Smt. Nani plaintiff-respondents No.l arid 2 on the ground inter-alia that the land in dispute is an ancestral property and they are members of the joint Hindu family and they are governed by Mitakshara Scheol of Hindu Law. According to the plaint allegation, plaintiff No;l Bhagwana is a. minor coparcener while his mother plaintiff No. 2 Nani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.