SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 391

ARUN MADAN
Chand Ratan Mohta – Appellant
Versus
Collector (Land Acquisition) Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Prasad, for Applicant

Honble MADAN, J. — The facts giving rise to the filing of this Application, briefly stated, are that on 15.4.94 when the above noted Appeal was taken up for hearing, neither the appellant nor his counsel was present in court. Shri N..R. Choudhary, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, was heard and the Appeal was decided by this court on merits.

(2). Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Rajasthan Government issued a Notification which was duly published on 2.1.80 under section 4 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act (for short the Act) for acquisition of certain lands situated in Phulera (Jaipur) including 8 bighas of land in Khasra No. 474 belonging to the appellant. After compliance of necessary legal formalities, physical possession of the land in question was taken over on 19.7.80 by the Tehsildar, Phulera and handed over to Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd. (For short RIICO), Udhyog Bhawan, Jaipur (respondent No. 2 herein) for whose benefit the land was acquired for the public purpose of establishment of industrial estate.

(3). The Land Acquisition Officer, Jaipur after examining all relevant evidence on the record, pronounced his awar















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top