SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 356

RAJENDRA SAXENA
Jai Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manoj Kumar Garg, for Appellant S.M. Singhvi, Public Prosecutor

Honble SAXENA, J. — Appellant Jai Ram, his father, mother and brother viz; Neeku Ram, Smt. Surji and Menpal respectively faced trial before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Raisinghnagar for the offences u/ss.304-B and 498-A IPC. The learned trial Judge vide his judgment dated 1.7.92 acquitted Jai Ram, Smt. Surji and Menpal but found appellant Neeku Ram guilty for the offences u/ss.304-B and 498-A IPC and sentenced him to seven years rigorous imprisonment on the first count and to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.200/-and in default to further undergo one months R.I. on the second count and also directed that both the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.

(2). The facts of this case are short and simple and can be recapitulated within a narrow compass. Smt. Badu was married to appellant Jai Ram about two and a half years prior to her death, which took place on 17.9.91 in the house of her husband situated in chak 3 S.J.M. It is alleged that co-accused Neeku Ram was not satisfied with the dowry given by Sultana Ram, the father of the deceased, in the marriage and on the day of marriage, he had shown his resentment and dissatistaction. It is alleged that the app




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top