SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 3

R.S.KEJRIWAL
Radha Bai – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Pal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Samdaria, Resham Bhargava, for the Appellants Virendra Agrawal for the Respondent No.3

Honble KEJRIWAL, J. - This Miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been directed against the Award dated 4.2.1994, passed by Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ajmer, by which the claim of the appellants was rejected only on the ground that the Claim Application was filed beyond limitation.

(2). Brief relevant facts of the case are that in a motor accident, which took place on 16.3.1999, Shri Likham Das, husband of appellant No. 1 and the father of the appellant Nos. 2 to 6 died. The appellants filed a Claim Petition on 6.4.1991. The learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ajmer, vide his order dated 4.2.1994, rejected the said application only on the ground that the same was filed beyond one year from the date of accident, and as such was not maintainable in view of Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Being aggrieved with the said Award, the appellants filed the present appeal. During the pendency of appeal, sub-section (3) of Section 166 has been deleted by Act, No. 54/1994, which came into force on 14.11.1994. Now, in the Amended Act, there is no period prescribed for filing a claim application, meaning thereby that the c








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top