V.G.PALSHIKAR, B.R.ARORA
Suraj Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sita Devi – Respondent
(2). The facts giving rise to the appeal, stated in brief, are that one shri Sohan Lal expired on 9.10.89 leaving a Will in respect of his properties. He was employed as a Mistry in the Rajasthan State Electricity Board and had retired from service months before his death. Proceedings were, therefore, initiated under the Indian Succession Act to obtain probate of this Sill. Grant of probate was opposed by the present appellant Smt. Suraj Devi, widow of Sohan Lal Mali on the allegation that the Will is a forged document . It has been created to deprive her of her succession rights, she being legally married wife of Sohanlal.
(3). In the proceedings, it was submitted by the respondent Sita Devi, in whose favour the Will is made, that Suraj Devi was divorced in 1948 and the deceased Sohanlal stayed with his brothers and sister and the sister used to look after him and, therefore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.