SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 181

V.G.PALSHIKAR, B.R.ARORA
Suraj Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sita Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Shreemalee, for Appellant M.C. Bhoot, for Respondent

Honble PALSHIKAR, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 17th May 94 passed by Honble Single Judge of this Court in S.B.Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2 of 1994, confirming the judgment dated 4.12.93 passed by the District Judge, Jodhpur, granting Probate of a will under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

(2). The facts giving rise to the appeal, stated in brief, are that one shri Sohan Lal expired on 9.10.89 leaving a Will in respect of his properties. He was employed as a Mistry in the Rajasthan State Electricity Board and had retired from service months before his death. Proceedings were, therefore, initiated under the Indian Succession Act to obtain probate of this Sill. Grant of probate was opposed by the present appellant Smt. Suraj Devi, widow of Sohan Lal Mali on the allegation that the Will is a forged document . It has been created to deprive her of her succession rights, she being legally married wife of Sohanlal.

(3). In the proceedings, it was submitted by the respondent Sita Devi, in whose favour the Will is made, that Suraj Devi was divorced in 1948 and the deceased Sohanlal stayed with his brothers and sister and the sister used to look after him and, therefore





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top