SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 361

RAJENDRA SAXENA
Mishriya – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S. Charan for Petitioners H.R. Panwar, Public Prosecutor

Honble SAXENA, J. — This revision petition has been directed against the order dated 24.11.93 passed by the learned Special Judge, S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Cases, Pali, whereby she framed charge for the offence under section 304-B I.P.C. against all the petitioners.

(2). Briefly stated the prosecution case is that deceased Smt. Kankuri daughter of Khima Ghanchi was married to petitioner Mishriya some time in the year 1984. On the same day petitioner Mishriyas sister Smt. Gawari was married in exchange (Anta- Santa) to Damariya, the brother of deceased Smt. Kankuri. The Muklawa of the deceased was performed some time in the year 1988. It is alleged that Smt. Kankuri was being maltreated and harassed by petitioners Mishriya, Gheesa Ram and Smt. Pemi, the father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the deceased, they used to tell her that she was a lady of easy virtue and as such they would not keep her in their house. It is further the case of the prosecution that for last six months prior to the alleged incident, which took place on 29.4.1990, Smt. Kankuri was living at her parents house situated in village Bussi. The petitioners house is also situated in a hem

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top