SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 361

Rajasthan High Court
Honble Rajendra Saxena, J.
Mishriya and Others - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 18 of 1994
Decided On : July 06, 1995

Advocates Appeared:
N.S. Charan for Petitioners H.R. Panwar, Public Prosecutor

Headnote:(a) Penal Code — Section 304-B— The basic ingredient of this offence is cruelty or harassment, soon before the death —The words soon before the death means within reasonable time and quite close in proximity prior to death — In the present there is no evidence in fact it is totally absent — Held — Charge under this section cannot be upheld. (Para 10)(b) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 227 - When to discharge an accused ? — Guide lines formulated by the Apex Court followed (AIR 1979 SC 366) - The court will sift and weigh the evidence on record for the limited purpose — The court will consider if there is sufficient ground to presume of the commission of the offence — Mere suspicion will not do but there should be grave suspicion — Court will satisfy that there is no frivolous accusation — Total effect and broad probabilities of the evidence will be considered. (Para 8) Revision accepted.

       

Honble SAXENA, J. — This revision petition has been directed against the order dated 24.11.93 passed by the learned Special Judge, S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Cases, Pali, whereby she framed charge for the offence under section 304-B I.P.C. against all the petitioners.

(2). Briefly stated the prosecution case is that deceased Smt. Kankuri daughter of Khima Ghanchi was married to petitioner Mishriya some time in the year 1984. On the same day petitioner Mishriyas sister Smt. Gawari was married in exchange (Anta- Santa) to Damariya, the brother of deceased Smt. Kankuri. The Muklawa of the deceased was performed some time in the year 1988. It is alleged that Smt. Kankuri was being maltreated and harassed by petitioners Mishriya, Gheesa Ram and Smt. Pemi, the father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the deceased, they used to tell her that she was a lady of easy virtue and as such they would not keep her in their house. It is further the case of the prosecution that for last six months prior to the alleged incident, which took place on 29.4.1990, Smt. Kankuri was living at her parents house situated in village Bussi. The petitioners house is also situated in a hemlet (Dhani) near the boundary of village Bussi. Smt. Gavari had delivered a baby child about three months prior to the incident and as such she was also living at her parents house. On 29.4.90, petitioner Mishriya came to his in laws house to fetch his wife Smt. Kankuri (deceased), who was reluctant to go to her in-laws house. However, her parents namely Khima and Smt. Phuli persuaded her to go with Mishriya, because they apprehended that in case she did not go to petitioners house, their daughter Smt. Gavari will also not be sent to her husband Damariyas house. Ultimately on 29.4.90 at about 10 a.m. Khima and Smt. Phuli performed "Vida" of Smt. Kankuri. Her brother Damariya took her on a bicycle, while petitioner Mishriya followed them on foot. After leaving Smt. Kankuri at her in-laws house, Damariya came back on the same day. It is the case of the prosecution that Smt. Kankuri died in the night of 29.4.90 as she had consumed some poison. Khima Ram lodged a report the said incident on 1.5.90 at 9.00 a.m. at Police Station Guda Endla, where a case under sections 498A & 306 I.P.C. was registered. The Dy. S.P., who conducted the investigation in this case, prepared the site plans of the Dhani as also the house of petitioners, seized samples of vomit stained soil and control soil therefrom. He also prepared the memo of the dead body of Smt. Kankuri. The Medical Board consisting of three doctors, conducted the post-mortem examination of the dead body of Smt. Kankuri. The doctors did not notice any external injury on her body. They preserved and sealed the visceras containing her liver, lungs, spleen, kidney as also the stomach and its contents and piece of small intestine in two bottles, which were sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory for chemical and histopathological examination. The Medical Board tentatively opined that the cause of death of the deceased appeared to be due to poisoning. However, the final opinion was reserved. The Assistant Director, State Forensic Science Laboratory vide his report dated 26.3.90 opined that the portions of visceras of the deceased and the vomited soil gave positive test for the presence of monocrotophos insecticide. During investigation it also transpired that deceased Smt. Kankuri had vomited twice on the day of incident just before her Vida, that thereafter she had vomited twice in the way, when she was being taken by her brother Damariya on a bicycle and that thereafter she again vomited in the Dhani of Mishriya and ultimately died on the same day. It further transpired from investigation that Smt. Kankuri had taken the said insecticide at her parents house. After completion of the investigation, the police submitted the challan against the petitioners for the offences under sections 498A & 306 I.P.C. on


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top