Honble YADAV, J. — The instant revision is directed against the order dated 27.7.94 passed by learned Civil Judge-cum- Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria District Sri Ganganagar in Civil Suit No 84 of 1993, whereby, the learned court issued notices under. Order 32, CPC to the defendant- petitioners on 31.3.94 calling upon the defendant-petitioners to attend the court and to do Pairvi of the case on their behalf as they have attained majority during the pendency of litigation instead of pairvi being done by their natural guardian Shri Hakam Singh who happened to be their father. The learned court- below vide its notice dated 31.3.94 called upon the defendant- petitioners to put in their appearance on 28.4.1994.

(2) In pursuance of the aforesaid notice issued by the learned Civil Judge-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, both the defendant-petitioners appeared in court and moved an application on 18.5.94 seeking the leave of the court to file written statement. In the said application, they have stated that they want to put forth with their claim at their own discretion. They also alleged in their application that they are not able to contest; their suit in correct p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document