SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 301

RAJENDRA SAXENA
Deepak Kumar Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Singhal & G.R. Goyal, for Petitioner H.R. Panwar, Public Prosecutor

Honble SAXENA, J. — Petitioner Deepak Kumar Goyal aggrieved by the order dated 14.4.95 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar cancelling his bail under Sec. 439 (2) Cr.P.C. and directing him to surrender himself before the learned A.C.J.M. on 18.4.95 and further directing the said Magistrate to send him to the judicial custody, has preferred this petition under Sec. 482 Cr.P.C. bearing S.B. Cr. Misc. Application No. 202/95 and anticipatory bail application u/s. 438 Cr.P.C. bearing S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 699/95.

(2). Since both these petitions emanate from the impugned order, those are being disposed-off by a common order.

(3). Now briefly the skeletal facts. Deceased Saroj Bala was married on 7.5.94 to the petitioner and she died on the night intervening 1st and 2nd Dec. 1995 at petitioners house in abnormal circumstances. Initially, an enquiry u/s. 176 Cr.P.C]. was conducted by the City Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar. The Medical Board consisting of three doctors conducted the post mortem examination of the deceased and found black points at nostrils and upper lip and one abrasion 1 1/5" x 1/4" x 1/5" on the right side of mandible. On dissection, the Board fou








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top