SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 199

Y.R.MEENA
Ummed – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Biri Singh & P.D. Singh, for Appellant Sumitra Goyal, Public Prosecutor for State

Honble MEENA, J. — This appeal is directed against the judgment of trial court dated 9.11.94 whereby the trial court has convicted the accused appellant for the offence u/s. 8/18 of the N.D.P.S. Act and sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and also pay fine Rs. one lac, in default of payment of fine, further undergo 2 years rigorous imprisonment.

(2). On 31.3.93, one Ranglal was apprehended by the officials of Narcotic Department and from his possession 2 kg. opium has been recovered. At that point of time, Ranglal furnished the information that he was going to hand over this Opium to one Maniram and appellant. On this information, the S.P. Central Bureau of Narcotics, Kota has issued search authorisation warrant to Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Inspector. On 2.4.93 at 11.00 p.m. Mahesh Kumar along with staff and police officials went to Jhunjhunu and on 3.4.93, the house of the appellant was searched. During search, appellant was found in the house. The house was in joint possession of accused appellant and Maniram (brother of accused). Mahesh Kumar asked the appellant whether he wants to search his house by any Magistrate or gazetted officer, but the appellant agreed that he ha









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top