SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Raj) 91

RAJESH BALIA
Bapu Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chandra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Rajvanshi, for Appellants N.P. Gupta, for Respondent

Honble BALI A, J. — This is defendant-tenants second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 8.2.1994 passed by Additional District Judge, Nimbahera affirming the judgment and decree passed by Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Nimbahera dated 3.4.1987, decreeing the plaintiffs suit for eviction on the ground of default in payment of rent for a period of more than six months on the date of filing of the suit.

(2). Facts necessary to be* noticed are that the appellants are tenant in the suit premises situated at Nimbahera since 1.3.1980 @ Rs. 75/- per month. On the date of filing of suit in 1982 the defendant had already defaulted in payment of rent of 19 months. In addition to Rs. 75/- as rent, Rs. 5/- per month as water charges where also to be paid. On 11.7.1983, the trial Court determined the amount of rent payable under Section 13(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950. The defendant failed to deposit the amount so determined within the time allowed under Section 13(4) and delayed the payment. The plaintiff moved an application for striking out defence. The defendant moved an application for extension of time and condoning delay in making payment















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top