SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 305

RAJENDRA SAXENA
Shera Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sandeep Mehta, for Petitioners H.R. Panwar Public Prosecutor

Honble SAXENA, J. — Heard. Perused the order dated 8.6.94, whereby learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Asind allowed the application filed by the Addl. Public Prosecutor under Sec. 311 Cr.P.C. and ordered that the true copy of arrest memo dated 11.7.83, by which the petitioner was alleged to have been arrested under Sec. 41 read with Section 109 Cr.P.C. be taken on record the further held that it was a true copy of arrest memo, genuineness thereof could not be disputed. He further held that the petitioner shall be free to send for the original arrest memo and cross examine PW 9 and Investigating Officer Rameshwarlal.

(2). The petitioner is facing trial for the offence under Sec. 4/9 of the Opium Act before the trial court. The alleged incident took place in the year 1983. It is alleged by the prosecution that the petitioner was arrested on 11.7.83 under Sec. 41 read with Sec. 109 Cr.P.C. and that in pursuance to his information given under Sec. 27 of Evidence Act, the contraband opium was recovered. However no arrest memo was filed alongwith challan papers. When Rameswarlal Investigating Officer was being examined in the trial court, the Addl. Public Prosecutor submitted the car



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top