SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 523

B.R.ARORA, D.C.DALELA
Poosa Ram – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N. Calla, for Petitioner C.R. Jakhar, Additional Government Advocate

Honble ARORA, J. — Petitioner Poosa Ram and respondent No. 7 Mani Ram s/o Kishna Ram Jat, were the recorded Khatedar tenants of 32 Bighas one Biswa of land bearing old Khasra Number 26 and new Khasra Numbers 368, 374, 377 and 379, situated in village Dariyasar tehsil Nohar district Sri Ganganagar. Earlier to the last settlement, two Bighas of this land, situated in new Khasra Number 368, was entered in the Revenue Record as the Agricultural land. In the last settlement, these two Bighas of land was entered as "Gair Mumkin Aabadi land". The entry was made without notice to the petitioner and respondent No.7 — the Khatedars of this land. After the settlement Operations were over, when the petitioner came to know that his land has been entered in the revenue record as the Gair Mumkin Aabadi land, he moved an application under Section 136 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act (for short, the Act) before the Sub-Divisional Officer cum Land Record Officer, Nohar, for the correction of the entry. The Land Record Officer, Nohar, by its order dated 1.8.78, allowed the application filed by the petitioner and ordered for correction of the entry. He, also, directed the Tehsildar, Nohar, vide Annex











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top