R.R.YADAV
Sayad Asif Madani – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Safi – Respondent
(2). Brief facts necessary to be noticed for disposal of the instant revision are that a suit for eviction was filed against the present revisionist in which his defence was struck off and against the said order, he filed an appeal before the learned District Judge, Udaipur, which was dismissed.
(3). Against dismissal of the appeal, he filed a revision before this Court which was admitted and ad interim stay order was granted on 10.5.1994. It appears from the impugned order that the case was posted for orders on 27.7.94 and on that day, none was present on behalf of the respondent-plaintiff, who is non- petitioner here in the present petition. On 27.7.94, the ad interim stay order dated 10.5.94 was allowed to continue till further orders, which reads thus, –
``Honble Mr. N.C. Kochhar, J.
Mr. V.L. Mathur, for the petitioner
None for the respondent
Although Shri D.R. Bhand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.