SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 15

P.P.NAOLEKAR
Kamal Kishore Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.K. Vyas, for Petitioners L.S. Udawat, Addl. Advocate General

Honble Naolekar, J.– This is a joint writ petition filed by 13 petitioners seeking the relief that the respondents may be directed to grant regular grade-increments to them with effect from the date of their initial appointment in service alongwith other admissible allowances and not from the date from which they have been regularised in service as has been done by the respon- dents.

(2). Petitioners Rakesh Bhandari, Dinesh Bafna, Deepak Mohanot, Surendra Raj Mohnot and Manmohan Lal were given appointment by the Registrar, Rajasthan High Court purely on urgent/ad hoc/temporary basis by orders dated 21.01.86, 20.02.86 and 26.06.86 for a period of six months in the first instance. Later on, they were transferred on their request to the office of the Government Advocate, however, they remained ad hoc employees in the office of the Government Advocate till they were regularised. Petitioner K.K. Vyas was appointed by the Special Judge, Sati Niwaran Court, Jaipur by order dated 20.10.87 upto 30.12.87. Later on, he was transferred to the Government Advocates office and remained ad hoc employee till regularisation. Petitioner Suresh Kumar Khatri was appointed in the office of the Special Pu














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top