SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 551

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Honble R.R. YADAV, J.
Smt. Tulsi and Others - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 990 of 1992 a.23 Other Writs
Decided On : October 09, 1995

Advocates Appeared:
H.S. Sidhu, N.K. Goyal & Sudesh Gupta, for Petitioners L.M. Lodha, for Respondents

Headnote:Rajasthan Colonisation Act, 1954 , Sec.7, Sec.28 and Rajasthan Colonisation (Allotment and Sale of Govt. Land in Indira Gandhi Canal Colony Area) Rules, 1975, Rule 17, Rule 24 – The provisions of sec.7 of the Act of 1954 are mandatory – Realisation of market price on the basis of departmental instructions/circulars – Land allotted as a special case under Rule 24 because the land has been acquired for public purposes – State Govt. has determined the scale of price in its notification – The notification cannot be allowed to be superseded by the departmental instructions/circulars against the mandatory provisions of Sec.7(2) of 1954 Act as well its Rule 20 – It is non-est and can be ignored by this court. (Paras 15,16,20 & 27)

       Once it is established that the State Government itself has determined the scale of price in para 3 of the notification dated 23.11.1985 to the land allotted to the petitioners either in command area or in uncommand area in Indira Gandhi Nahar Project area the price of the land in dispute is liable to be charged at two times the reserve price of such land prescribed in rule 17 of the Rules of 1975 with a rider to the proviso added to the said rule 17 of the Rules of 1975 and as such the respondents are not entitled to charge the price other than the price stipulated in the aforesaid notification dated 23.11.1985. (Para 20)

       Statutory notification dated 23.11.1985 issued by the State Government fixing scale of reserve price of the disputed land cannot be allowed to be superseded by the departmental instructions/circular dated 19.10.1987 as claimed by the answering respondents. In my humble opinion the impugned departmental instructions/circular dated 19.10.1987 has been issued against the mandatory provisions contemplated under sub-section (2) of Sec.7 of Act No. XXVII of 1954 as well as rule 20 of the Rules of 1975 framed under the aforesaid Act. It is non-est and can be ignored by this Court. (Para 27)

Honble YADAV, J. – All these petitioners relate allotment of land in their favour by Sub Divisional Officer of Bikaner. The land of all these petitioners was acquired for Mahajan Field Firing Range in Bikaner District.

(2). After acquisition of land of the petitioners for aforesaid purposes the State Government in exercise of powers conferred by Rule 24 of the Rajasthan Colonisation (Allotment and Sale of Government Land in the Indira Gandhi Canal Colony Area) Rules, 1975( in short ` the Rules of 1975) read with Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rules, 1970 (in short ` the Rules of 1970) and Section 264 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1965 (in short ` the Act of 1965) has issued the Notification No.F. 3(8) /G.S.R.162,Rev./Col./81,dt.23.11.1985, Raj.Gaz.Ex.Pt.IV- C(I),dated 10.1.1986,P.339. The aforesaid notification is quoted below in extenso:–

"1. The families displaced from the Mahajan Field Firing Range, Bikaner, hereinafter referred to as the displaced families, shall be offered Barani land/Command/Uncommand Land in Bikaner dis- trict, whether in the Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Area or outside such area.

2. The price for the Barani Land shall be charged at the rate of Rs.300/- per bigha.

3. The displaced families interested in being allotted land in the command or uncommand areas as the Indira Gandhi Nahar project may be allotted land in such area at the price charged at two times the reserve price of such land prescribed in rule 17 of the Rajasthan Colonisation (Allotment and Sale of Government Land in the Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Area) Rules,1975.

4. Two bighas of uncommand/barani land or bigha of command land in the Mahajan Field Firing Range shall be computed to be equal to one bigha of command land in the Indira Gandhi Nahar

Project Area.

5. The total land to be alloted to a displaced family shall be equivalent to the land in area from which such family has been displaced subject to ceiling limit is prescribed in the law for the time being in force."

(3). All the petitioners have filed the instant writ petitions for quashing the demand of price at market rate of the land allotted to them in pursuance of the departmental instructions/circular dated 9.10.1987, Anx. 5 to the writ petition filed by Smt. Tulsi & Ors. The same departmental instructions/circular fixing price of land at market rate are also filed in other writ petitions making demand of price of the land in dispute at the market rate.

(4). The aforesaid departmental instructions/circular dated 19.10.1987 and notices for demanding price at market rate have been challenged by the petitioners on the ground that the demand of price of land in dispute at market rate on the basis of departmental instructions/circular dated 19.10.1987 is per-se illegal, therefore, the demand notices as well as aforesaid departmental instructions/circular fixing price of land at market rate are liable to be quashed.

(5). At the request of the learned counsel for the parties all the aforesaid writ petitions were heard together as the points involved, grievances expressed and reliefs sought in all these petitions are the same hence I propose to dispose them off by a common order treating SB Civil Writ Petition No. 990/1992 as a leading case in which reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the respondents.

(6). The reliefs sought by the petitioners in aforesaid writ petitions are being opposed by the respondents by filing returns on the ground inter-alia that the petitioners were earlier charged price of Barani land as prescribed under the notification dated 23.11.1985 @ Rs,300/- per bigha but when the said land was brought in Indira Gandhi Nahar Project Area and became command land they are entitled to charge difference of price at market rate in pursuance of departmental instructions/circular dated 19.10.1987.

(7). From the averments made in the writ petition as well as the reply filed on behalf of the respondents it is eviden















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top