R.L. Jangid, for Appellants

M. Mridul, Senior Advocate with Miss Kusum Rao, for Respondents

Honble B.R. ARORA, J. – These three appeals arise out of the judgment dated 31-7-95 passed by the learned Single Judge, by which the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions filed by the respondent-petitioners, set-aside the orders of termination of their services and directed the appellants to allow the respondents to continue in service as they were appointed after due selection under the Rules.

(2). The respondents (petitioners in the writ petitions) case, as set-up in the writ petitions, is that in pursuance to the advertisement dated 5-7-93 issued by the District Education Officer, Rajsamand, they applied for the post of Lab. Boys/ Class IV Servant in various schools in Rajsamand District. They were called for interview. The interviews were held on 9-9-93. They were selected and were given appointments as Lab.Boys in the pay scale of Rs. 775-1025/- by the appointment orders issued on 10-9- 93, 11-9-93, 13-9-93, 14-10-93, 21-11-93 and 26-11-93. They were appointed on temporary basis for a fixed term, i.e., upto 31-3- 94, which was extended upto 30-4-94. No order for extending the ser

Click Here to Read the rest of this document