Honble SAXENA, J. – Heard. Perused the order dated 8.2.95 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Gangapur City in Session case No. 2/92 whereby he after hearing the parties and perusing the charge sheet & the evidence collected by the investigating officer, ordered for framing the charge against the accused-respondent No. 1 to 3 for offences under sections 498A, 306 & 201 I.P.C. only and rejected the complainants application for framing the charge against them for offence under Section 304-B I.P.C.

(2). The deceased Smt. Savitri was married to respondent Raju alias Rajendra Kumar sometime in April 1990. It is alleged that at the time of marriage the respondent Motilal who is father of Raju demanded a colour T.V. & Rs. 10000/- as dowry. It is further alleged that Smt. Savitri was harassed at her in our house in connection with the demand of dowry. After about 1 1/2 months of her marriage, Smt. Savitri came back to her parents house where she stayed for about 4-5 months. It is further alleged that thereafter she was taken back to her in laws house and that on 17/9/91 her death took place in abnormal circumstances due to excessive burns. It is also alleged that the accused-respondents

Click Here to Read the rest of this document