SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Raj) 582

R.R.YADAV
Pooranmal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Mohd. Yaseen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K. Rastogi, for Petitioners Rameshwar Chouhan, for Respondents

Honble YADAV, J. – The instant revision has been filed against the order dated 6.1.95 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Nimbahera in civil misc. appeal No. 1/95 by means of which he dismissed the appeal and upheld the order of rejection of application for temporary injunction passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Nimbahera in civil misc. case No. 3/94 dated 19.12.1994.

(2). Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the orders impugned passed by both the learned courts below.

(3). In the instant case show cause notice was issued on 16.8.95 to ascertain from the opposite parties as to what was the stage of the construction over the disputed land. The opposite parties No. 1 and 2 are represented by Shri Rameshwar Chouhan. He stated before me that the construction over the disputed land has been completed.

(4). In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances no useful purpose would be served to interfere with the orders passed by both the learned courts below. However, it is made clear that in such a situation where nature of land in dispute is about to be changed due to which there is likelihood of damage or injury to the subject matter of the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top