R.R.YADAV
Pooranmal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Mohd. Yaseen – Respondent
(2). Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the orders impugned passed by both the learned courts below.
(3). In the instant case show cause notice was issued on 16.8.95 to ascertain from the opposite parties as to what was the stage of the construction over the disputed land. The opposite parties No. 1 and 2 are represented by Shri Rameshwar Chouhan. He stated before me that the construction over the disputed land has been completed.
(4). In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances no useful purpose would be served to interfere with the orders passed by both the learned courts below. However, it is made clear that in such a situation where nature of land in dispute is about to be changed due to which there is likelihood of damage or injury to the subject matter of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.