SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 220

N.K.AGRAWAL
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
J. Nagpal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Goyal, for Appellant-State Praveen Balwada, for Respondents

Honble AGARWAL, J. – A complaint (Ex.P.6) was filed by the Enforcement Inspector with the allegation that at the time of inspection of the shop of M/s J. Nagpal & Company, certain tyres and tubes were found in the stock, but neither the stock position nor the prices of the saleable goods had been displayed by the dealer at the shop. The Complaint was made against the firm M/s J. Nagpal & Com- pany, Amer Road, Jaipur and also its proprietors Mr. Keshwanand Nagpal and the proprietors son Mr. Rajendar Kumar Nagpal. At the time of inspection by the Enforcement Inspector, it was Shri Rajendra Kumar, who was found at the shop because his father, who was the proprietor of the business, was away to Shri Ganganagar due to illness of his mother. 22 tyres of different sizes and 6 tubes were found in stock and these were taken into possession by the Enforcement Inspector under Seizure Memo (Ex.P.2) because the stocks had not been displayed nor the prices had been shown on the notive board as required under the Rajasthan Trade Articles (Licensing and Control ) Order, 1980.

(2) The goods, so seized, were given on Supurdginama to Shri Yogesh Kumar (PW.2) under Ex. P.3 Copies of the application for









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top