R.R.YADAV
Jeeva Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2) Facts of the present case are not disputed upto this extent that the petitioner was granted a short term permit under Rule 63 of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as `the Rules of 1986) by the Mining Engineer, Sirohi for extracting and removing 200 tonnes of earth clay from Khasra No. 261 of village Tawab, District Jalore for which he had paid Rs. 300/- at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per ton, a photstat whereof is filed and marked as Annx. 1 to the writ petition.
(3). I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. M.L. Shreemali as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 Mr. R.L. Jangid and learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 Mr. S.K. Vyas.
(4). It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. M. L. Shreemali that it is inconceivable that a person who has been granted short term permit under Rule 63 of the Rules of 1986 to quarry the brick earth has no right to construct t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.