SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 478

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, Jaipur Bench
Honble Y.R. Meena, J.
Hoshiyar Singh S/o Hari Singh and Others - Appellant
Versus
Ramkali W/o Shri Jaswant Singh and Others - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No 624 of 1996
Decided On : August 14, 1996

Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Mathur, for Petitioner M.A. Naqvi, for Respondents

Headnote:Cr. P.C. 1973, Sec. 145 and Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, Sec. 212 — On the complaint of SHO; Police Station the Executive Magistrate (SDM) initiated proceedings — Dispute regarding title and possession — Held — SDM directed to consider the documents of the parties and if necessary attach the land and appoint receiver to avoid blood shed — Order of attachment and receiver will be for a period of four months from the date of attachment order — Mean while the aggrieved party can approach to civil Court for appointment of receiver u/s. 212 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act. (Para 6)

       

Honble MEENA, J. — By this petition, the petitioners have prayed that proceedings initiated under Sec. 145 Cr.P.C. be quashed.

(2) On a complaint filed by SHO, Police Station Mandhan, the SDM, Behror initiated the proceedings under Sec. 145 Cr.P.C. against both the parties regarding Khasra Nos. 108, 109, 128,154, 261,240,220, 272, 273, 248,85,.131, 345, 134,168,169, and 227 situated in village Mangalpur and Khasra Nos.572, 573,582,600,601,578 and 579 situated in village Mandhan, Tehsil Behror. There was a dispute regarding title as well as possession. 18.8.96 is next date in SDM court for orders whether the disputed lands be attached or not ?

(3) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(4) The normal rule is that when civil proceedings are pending, the parallel proceedings under Sec. 145 Cr.P.C. should not continue.

(5) Mr. Naqvi brought to my notice the decision of their Lordships in case of Prakash Chand Sachdeva vs. State & Anr. (1), wherein, their Lordships have taken the view that criminal proceedings under Sec. 145 Cr.P.C. can be continued even though civil suit is pending.

(6) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the case relied on by Mr. Naqvi, the SDM, Behror is directed to consider the documents of both the parties and hear them on 19.8.96, to see whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the attachment of lands in dispute is necessary, if necessary, attach the land and appoint receiver to avoid blood shed. That order of attachment and appointment of receiver will continue only for four months from the date of appointment of receiver. The criminal proceedings, the attachment and appointment of receiver will come to an end on expiry of four months from the date of attachment order. Meanwhile, the aggrieved party can approach to civil court for appointment of receiver under Sec. 212 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. (7). With the above observations, the petition is disposed of.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top