V.G.PALSHIKAR
Ravindra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). The father of the petitioner expired on 8.4.85 while discharging his duties as a Government employee. This fact is not disputed. The fact that the petitioner is an Agriculture Graduate is also not disputed.
(3). The petitioner, therefore, filed an application on 26.4.85 under the Rules, claiming appointment on compassionate ground. He was replied by a letter dated 7.8.85 that he will not be able to get appointment to the post of Assistant Agriculture Officer under the Rules of 1975 and he was offered an appointment to the post of Agriculture Supervisor. According to the petitioner, he accepted the appointment as Agriculture Supervisor to save his family members from starvation. According to the petitioner, he was eligible for appointment as Agriculture Officer as per the Rules of 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.