SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 171

V.G.PALSHIKAR
Suresh Kumar Chug – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Mridul, Sr. Advocate, for Petitioner C.R. Jakhar, for Dy. G.A.

Honble PALSHIKAR, J. – By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dt. 26.9.92 (Annex. 8 to the petition) as illegal and unsustainable in law for several grounds mentioned in the petition.

(2). The factual matrix necessary for adjudication of the stated briefly is as follows;

(3). The petitioner was working as Lower Division Clerk in the District Industries Centre, Udaipur and was placed under suspension for remaining absent without leave and for wilful disobedience of the orders, this was done by order dt. 13.3.89. on 7.2.90, a charge-sheet was framed and served on the petitioner with memorandum of charges and enquiry was commenced against the petitioner un- der Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as `CCA Rules). The charges basically pertained to wilful disobedience of the orders and wilful absence without obtaining leave. During the proceedings of the departmental enquiry, the petitioner complained on several occasions regarding non-supply of the statement of charges, statement of allegations and several documents on which reliance was placed by the department for those charges. It is also













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top