SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 736

N.K.JAIN
Rajshri Mitra – Appellant
Versus
Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Bhardwaj, for M.M. Ranjan, for Petitioner R.P. Singh, for Respondents

Honble JAIN, J. – By this writ petition, petitioner seeks a direction to be issued to the respondent No. 2 for re-evaluation of the subject No. 043 (Chemistry Theory) for Roll No. 1206082.

(2)The respondents have filed reply and submits that the petitioner has already been intimated that they have already scrutinised the marks after re-chec-

king of the result and no mistake has been detected. It is stated that there is no provision for re- evaluation of the marks as prayed for. Reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court rendered in Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr. Vs. Parents forum for Meaningful Education & Ors. (1) where in the direction given by the High Court to the Board to consider the question of reintro-

ducing the system of re- evaluation of answer sheets was repelled holding that in view of the law laid down by this Court, no direction can be given to the Board to introduce the system of re-evaluation and their lordships has left the question entirely to the discretion of the Board. Learned counsel for the respondents has also relied on the decision of the Punjab High Court in Gulshan Grover Vs. H.D. Uni-

versity reported in (2) whereein it has bee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top