SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 205

J.C.VERMA
Fateh Kumari Sisodia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manish Shishodia, for Petitioner V.D. Vyas, for Respondents

Honble VERMA, J. – The petitioner had applied for M.A. Hindi Examination a Two Years course of Mohanlal Sukhadia University Udaipur (hereinafter called `the University).She appeared in M.A.(Examination under Roll No. 92019 and secured first position by obtaining 251 marks out of 400 marks. After clearing the M.A.(Previous) Examination she appeared in the M.A. (Final) Examination, the re- sult of which was declared on 14.3.1993 and in the result so declared, it was shown that she had secured 226 marks out of 400 marks in the M.A. (Final ) Examination and, thus, the total marks in the M.A. (Previous) and M.A. (final) Examinations came to 477marks out of 800 marks. It is stated by the petitioner that in one of the subjects in the M.A. (Final) Examination i.e. `Hindi Natya Avam Rangamanch in the result sheet it is shown that she had secured 40 marks out of 100 marks. She had apprehension that by way of inadvertance or otherwise or by way of mistake the totalling and computation of marks had not been done properly and, therefore, she applied for re-evaluation of her answer-book of the said subject.The University had initially informed her that there was no change in the marks obtained b






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top