SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Mrs. Mehboobunissa – Appellant
Versus
Iftikar Ali Khan – Respondent
(2). These questions have emerged in the following circumstances :
BACK GROUND FACTS
(i) One Shri Ahmed Ali expired leaving behind him three sons, namely, Mohd. Ali, Iftikar Ali and Shaukat Ali. The property in dispute belonged to Late Shri Ahmed Ali. Shaukat Ali, after the death of Ahmed Ali, instituted a suit for partition of the property against Mohd.
Ali and Iftikar Ali, which was decreed on 3.3.1971.
(ii) Mohd. Ali thereafter, expired. Smt. Mehbubunnisa, petitioner, applied for the execution of the partition decree on or about 19/23.8.1980, claiming her the legal representative of late Mohd. Ali, as Smt. Afifunissa wife of late Mohd. Ali, had also expired and she being the daughter of late Mohd. Ali, was entitled to obtain possession of the property which came to her share.
(iii) In the execution petition mentioned hereinabove, Iftikar Ali raised objection that late Mohd. Ali in whos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.