B.J.SHETHNA
Tulsi Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
(2). Initially, on 28.11.90 notice was issued by the learned Single Judge of this Court to the respondents to show cause as to why this petition should not be admitted. Inspite of service, none appeared for the other side. Therefore, on 26.8.91 this petition was admitted and again notice of admission was ordered to be issued to the other side. On 17.1.92 it was ordered to be put up for final hearing on 5th Feb. 92. But for some or the other reasons it could not be heared on that date. On 2.9.92 it was heard by Honble R.S. Verma, J. (as he then was). At that time learned counsel Sh. Nanda for the petitioner raised the contention that the order of dicharge Annex. R-5 was bad as the same was not implemented within 14 days as mentioned in the order itself. He wanted ti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.