SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 387

B.J.SHETHNA
Tulsi Das – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Nanda, for Petitioner P.P. Choudhary with S.S.Lal, for Respondent

Honble SHETHNA, J. – The petitioner who belongs to a scheduled caste of ``HARIJAN was working as Class IV servant as ``SAFAIWALA with the Airforce, has challenged his impugned order of termination dated 13.10.87 passed by the respondent No. 3, the AOC-IN-C, HQ. SWAC IAS, Jodhpur in this petition and prayed to quash the same and to reinstate him in service with back wages and to grant all consequential benefits of service.

(2). Initially, on 28.11.90 notice was issued by the learned Single Judge of this Court to the respondents to show cause as to why this petition should not be admitted. Inspite of service, none appeared for the other side. Therefore, on 26.8.91 this petition was admitted and again notice of admission was ordered to be issued to the other side. On 17.1.92 it was ordered to be put up for final hearing on 5th Feb. 92. But for some or the other reasons it could not be heared on that date. On 2.9.92 it was heard by Honble R.S. Verma, J. (as he then was). At that time learned counsel Sh. Nanda for the petitioner raised the contention that the order of dicharge Annex. R-5 was bad as the same was not implemented within 14 days as mentioned in the order itself. He wanted ti














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top