S.C.MITAL, G.L.GUPTA
Kehar Singh – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent
(2). In the Habeas Corpus petition filed on 17.12.96, the detention order was challenged on various grounds but Mr. Kalla confined his arguments to only Ground No.3, and therefore the other grounds are not being mentioned in this order. Ground No.3 is that detenue Harjeet Singh was already in jail when the order of detention was passed and there was no likelihood of his being released on bail and therefore, the order is contrary to the provisions of law and contrary to the rights given under the Constitution of India.
(3). In the reply, the respondents
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.