Honble WADHWA, J.–The appellant is an advocate practicing in Delhi. He has filed this appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (in short `the Act) against order dated May 4, 1996 of the Disciplinary Committee of Bar Council of India holding him guilty of misconduct and suspending him from practice for a period of one year. This order by the Bar Council of India was passed as the Discipli- nary Committee of the Bar Council of Delhi could not dispose of the complaint received by it within a period of one year and proceedings has thus been transferred to the Bar Council of India under Section 36 B of the Act. Section 36-B enjoins upon the Disciplinary committee of State Bar Council to dispose of the complaint received by it under Section 35 of the Act expeditiously and in any case to conclude the proceedings within one year from the date of the receipt of the complaint or the date of initiation of the proceedings if at the instance of the State Bar Council. Under Section 35 of the Act where on the receipt of a complaint or otherwise the State Bar Council has reason to believe that any advocate on its role has been guilty of professional or other misconduct, it shall refer th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document