SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 660

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH
Cheeku Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
T.R. Singh, for Petitioner R.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor

Honble SINGH, J.–Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

(2). This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 5th February, 97 passed by the learned Special Judge, S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Merta in Sessions Case No. 75/92 State vs. Cheeku Singh @ Shatrudaman Singh. By the aforesaid order dated 5th February, 97 the learned Special Judge directed that Herak Mohammed, in whose presence the dying decla-ration of Shri Jiya Ram was recorded, be summoned for examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. It was observed by the learned Special Judge that it was in the interest of justice to summon Shri Herak Mohammed.

(3). The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in this case the prosecution had closed its evidence. The accused petitioner had been examinedunder Section 311 Cr.P.C. and the case was listed for final arguments and it was not necessary in the interest of justice to call the witness Herak Mohammed and the impugned order passed by the learned Special Judge is not justified in law, because, it is tentamounting to filling of the lacunas left by the prosecution.

(4). The learned Public Prose














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top