SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Raj) 71

ARUN MADAN
Shiv Dayal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C. Sharma, for Petitioner Manish Bhandari, for Respondents

Honble MADAN, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.

(2). The petitioner, who is a work-charged employee of the Irrigation Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur has filed this writ petition on the grounds inter-alia that he was initially appointed as Beldar in the Irrigation Department w.e.f. 1.5.1988 in the office of Respondent No.2 on daily wage basis @ 22/- per day tillFebruary, 1989 and thereafter the services of the petitioner were terminated by a verbal order without following the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by the Respondents. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the Respondents, the petitioner filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2679/89, titled : Shiv Dayal vs. State of Rajasthan on 24.1.1991 before this Court while allowing the above mentioned writpetition observed as under:-

``In the result, the writ petition is accepted and the verbal termination order dated 28.2.1989, is set aside. The petitioner shall be treated regular in service from 28.2.1989. The Petitioner shall also be entitled for the back wages. It is, therefore, directed that the Petitioner should be re-instated in service forthwith.

(3). In pursuance of the Order dated 24.1.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top