SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 137

G.L.GUPTA
Babu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C. Bhoot, for Petitioner S.R. Singhi, for Respondents Nos.1 to 5 S.N. Sharma, for Respondent No.6

Honble GUPTA, J.–Through this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the orders dated 3.6.1990 (Annx.1), 28.4.1990 (Anx.2) and 28.9.95 (Anx.3).

(2). The facts stated in the writ petition are that Akura Ram Meghwal Was Gairkhatedar tenant of the land measuring 37.14 Bighas of land in village Rajasar, now Chak 5 M.D. He sold this land to one Naresh Chandra on 18.5.1963. Naresh Chandra in his turn sold this land to petitioner Babu Singh on 24.5.1970 by registered sale deed who is in possession of the land since then. The proceedings under Section 175 were initiated against the petitioner on 2.2.1974 but the Assistant Collector dismissed the application vide order dated 22.9.1977 on the ground that the application was time barred. Appeal taken against that order before the Revenue Appellate Authority was pending. During revenue campaign on 3.6.1989 Amari w/o Akuraram made on application before the Assistant Collector, Annopgrah that the petitioner had been dispossessed of the land by force and the possession should be restored to her. It was found that Amari was a member of Scheduled Caste and therefore she other husband could not s



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top