Honble SINGH, J.–Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor none appeared on behalf of the non-petitioner No.2.

(2). By this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioners have challenged the order dated 2.5.1995 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratangarh in criminal revision No. 191/92. By the above mentioned order the learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition which was filed by the Poosa Ram (non petitioner No.2) and set aside the order dated 29.6.1990 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ratangarh.

(3). The facts of the case may be briefly summarised as below:

(4). On 1.6.1990 Poosa Ram (non-petitioner No.2) lodged the first information report No. 71/90, alleging there in the commission of offences under Sections 147, 447 and 323 IPC. On the basis of the first information report No. 71/90 lodged by non-petitioner No.2 the police registered a case and after investigation submitted the final report No.20/90, under Section 173 Cr.P.C. In the final, report submitted by the police it was stated that the allegations made by Poosa Ram were false and that he was actuated with the intention

Click Here to Read the rest of this document