SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 272

Supreme Court
Honble S. SAGHIR AHMAD & G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.
M/s. Spring Meadows Hospital and Another - Appellant
Versus
Harjoi Ahluwalia through K.S. Ahluwalia and Another - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 7708 of 1997
Decided On : March 25, 1998

Advocates Appeared:
Arun Khosla, K. Nijhawan, S. Rajappa, Sanjiv Sharma, Ashok K. Gupta, (H.D. Shourie) Advocates, for Caveator-in-person, for Appearing Parties

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Sec. 2(1)(d), 12(1)(a) and 14(1)(d) – Definition of ``Consumer – Wrong treatment given to minor-child – On account of negligence and deficiency on the part of the hospital authorities the child suffered irreparable damages and could survive only `as a mere vegetative – Child and his parents claimed compensation – Whether parents are `Consumer and entitle to compensation in addition to minor child? – Yes – Held – A person who hires or avails of any services and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person who hires the services – Parents of the child as well as the child are consumer within the meaning of Sec. 2(1)(d)(ii) of the Act. (Para 12)

       

Honble PATTANAIK, J.–These two appeals arise out of the order dated 16th June, 1997 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as `the Commission) in Original Petition No. 292 of 1994. The Hospital is the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 7708 of 1997 while the insurance company is the appellant in the other appeal. When the special leave applications out of which the two aforesaid appeals arise were listed for preliminary hearing, the Court had issued notice limited to the award of Rs. 5 lacs as compensation to the parents of the child even though the insurance company has raised the question of its liability to pay the compensation in question.

(2). A Complaint Petition was filed by minor Harjot Ahluwalia through his pare- nts Mrs. Harpreet Ahluwalia and Mr. Kamaljit Singh Ahluwalia before the Commission alleging that the minor was being treated at a Nursing Home in Noida in December, 1993. As there was no improvement in his health the said minor was brought to M/s. Spring Meadows Hospital, appellant in Civil Appeal No. 7708 of 1997 on 24th of December, 1993. In the hospital the patient was examined by the Senior Consultant Paediatrician, Dr. Promila Bhutani and on the advice of the said doctor the patient was admitted as an in-patient in the hospital. The doctor made the dia- gnosis that the patient was suffering from typhoid and intimated the parents that medicines have been prescribed for the treatment of the typhoid fever. On the 30th of December, 1993 at 9.00 a.m. Miss Bina Matthew, nurse of the hospital asked the father of the minor patient to get the injection - Inj. Lariago - to be administered intravenously to the minor patient. The father of the minor child purchased the me- dicine which was written down by the nurse and gave it, whereupon the nurse injected the same to the minor patient. The patient, immediately on being injected collapsed while still in the lap of his mother. It was further alleged that before administering the injection the nurse had not made any sensitive test to find out whether there would be any adverse reaction on the patient. Seeing the minor child collapse the parents immediately called for help and the Resident Doctor Dr. Dhananjay attended the patient. Said Dr. Dhananjay told the parents that the child had suffered a cardiac arrest and then by manually pumping the chest the Doctor attempted to revive the heartbeat. The hospital authorities then summoned an Anaesthetist, Dr. Anil Mehta who arrived within half an hour and then started a pro- cedure of manual respiration by applying the oxygen cylinder and manual Respirator. In the meantime Dr. Promila Bhutani also reached the hospital and the minor child was kept on a device called manual Respirator. Though the child was kept alive on the manual ventilator but the condition of the child did not show any improvement. In course of treatment as the minors platelets count fell, a blood transfusion was given but still no improvement could be seen. Dr. Mehta, therefore, intimated the parents that the hospital does not have the necessary facilities to manage the minor child and he should be shifted to an intensive Care Unit equipped with an Auto Respirator. On the advice of Dr. Mehta the parents brought the child and admitted him in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit of the All India Ins- titute of Medical Sciences on the 3rd January, 1994. In the institute the doctors examined the minor child thoroughly and informed the parents that the child is critical and even if he would survive, he would live only in a vegetative state as irreparable damage had been caused to his brain and there was no chance of revival of the damaged parts. The minor was then kept in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit of the AIIMS till 24th of January, 1994 and was thereafter discharged after informing the parents that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the minor child there. Dr. Anil Mehta as well as Dr. Naresh
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top