SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 641

B.J.SHETHNA
Yatesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pradeep Shah, for Petitioner S.K. Vyas, P.P.

Honble SHETHNA, J.–Learned counsel Shri Shah submitted that the learned Sessions Judge released the co-accused Smt. Kanya wife of Babulal, who is mother-in-law of deceased Gayatri @ Baby, therefore, the present petitioner-accused, who is husband of deceased Gayatri be also released on bail. Mr. Shah has produced the order dated 3.7.98 passed by learned Sessions Judge releasing Smt. Kanya on bail. In para 7 of the said order, the learned Judge has taken into consideration the fact that she is an old lady aged 70 years and ill treatment was given by Yatesh Kumar, husband of the deceased Gayatri, who was demanding Rs. 60,000/- or 10 tolas Gold. Once a serious offence under Section 304 B is registered against the accused then the present petitioner being the husband against whom a Specific allegation of demanding dowry is made then he cannot be released on bail. Merely because co-accused has been released on bail that itself would not be a ground to release the present accused petitioner on bail. Hence, the first submission of Mr. Shah is rejected.

(2). Second submission raised by Mr. Shah was that in this case the police has wrongly registered the case under Section 304 B against the a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top