MOHD.YAMIN
Sukhraj – Appellant
Versus
Poshi Bai – Respondent
``WHETHER on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Civil Judge, Sirohi was, by his order dated September 10, 1978, not right in maintaining the decree of demolition of the construction in question, passed by the Munsif Bali on September 29, 1977 ?
(2). Before deciding the question, it is pertinent to mention the facts of the case. Plaintiffs Bhabhutmal and Sagarmal filed a suit for possession and injunction alleging that a residential house was situated in village Khudala Tehsil Bali details of which are given in para No. 2 of the plaint. A patta of the house was granted by Thikana to the plaintiffs. The defendants had their house adjacent to the plaintiffs house on the western side. They started construction about two months before and insisted that they would open a new door towards the house and open land of the plaintiffs. This way the plaintiffs were threatening. Plaintiffs issued a notice on 28.5.71 that the defendant may not open any apertures towards the land of the plaintiffs and may not trespass over the land of the plaintiffs. But the defendants even then com
3. Krishna Kumar Agrawal & Ors. vs. Jai Kumar Jain & Anr. (AIR 1997 SC 300)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.