SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 46

G.L.GUPTA
Sarla Rani Vadehra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S. Shishodia Sr. Advocate assisted by Akhtar Khan, for Petitioner V. Kachhwaha, Public Prosecutor

Honble GUPTA, J.–This misc. petition is directed against the order dt. 12.10.89 and 12.12.89 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Bhilwara, whereby he allowed the application of the complainant-respondent No.2 for cross-examination of Smt. Sarla Rani Vadehra, accused-petitioner.

(2). The facts necessary to decide the petition are these. Respondent No.2 Sushri Sobhagya Goyal was the Lecturer in Girls College, Bhilwara. Smt. Sarla Vadehra (petitioner) was the Principal of that College. Miss Goyal filed a criminal complaint against Smt. Vadehra and one Shri Shivnath Singh Kapoor for offence u/Ss. 166, 167, 177, 187, 217, 218, 504 and 511 IPC. When the enquiry was being held by the Magistrate under Chapter XV Cr.P.C., an application was filed u/S. 91 Cr.P.C. by Miss. Goyal for the production of some documents from the office of Smt. Vadehra which was allowed. A notice was sent to Smt. Vadehra for producing the document. On 21.9.84 Smt. Vadehra did not appear in Court but sent a reply that she was not competent to produce the documents and it could only be done after the orders of the Director, College Education, Jaipur. The non-attendance of Smt. Vadehra in Court and the repl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top