SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Raj) 496

MOHD.YAMIN
Prem Singh Panwar – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature for Raj. Jodhpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Mridul, for Petitioner L.S. Udawat, Addl. Advocate General

Honble YAMIN, J.–Petitioner Prem Singh Panwar entered government service on being appointed as LDC in the Pratapgarh Judgeship on 12.3.1959. His first appointment was temporary but he was confirmed on the post of LDC on 3.3.1960. He thereafter passed the test of Accounts Clerk and consequently was appointed as Accounts Clerk by the office order dated 21.6.1967. He was promoted on the post of Office Assistant vide order dated 19.8.1974 w.e.f. 11/12.3.31974. He was confirmed on this post vide order dated 25.5.1979 with retrospective effect i.e. 12.3.1974. At the time of filing the writ petition he was holding this post. In between, the petitioner was made to officiate on the post of Munsarim number of times in absence of Munsarim even on leave or otherwise. No adverse entry was ever com- municated to the petitioner at any stage. No inquiry was held against him and he was never punished in any manner whatsoever.

(2). A false complaint was made against the petitioner some where in the year 1976-77 by one Durga Shankar Advocate and later on he did not choose to press it. A preliminary inquiry was held on this complaint but no case was found to have been made out against the petitioner. T









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top