Honble PATIL, CJ.–Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2). In brief, the facts leading to filing of the writ petition are the following:

(3). The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Milakpur in the year 1995. According to him, he was functioning as Sarpanch in the interest and welfare of the Panchayat as well as the public at large of the area. The members who were opposed to the petitioner, gave a proposal to the respondent No.2 for moving vote of `No Confidence against him. The respondent No.2, namely, the Chief Executive Officer and Secretary, Zila Parishad, Alwar, issued a notice on 23.12.97 informing that a meeting had been convened on 15.01.98 for consideration of `No Confidence motion against the petitioner. As many as 8 allegations were made against the petitioner, on the basis of which a vote of `No Confidance was sought to be moved. It is not necessary to give the details of the allegations in order to decide the controversy raised.

(4). The petitioner had informed the Vikas Adhikari Panchayat Samiti, Ramgarh, that the three Panchas, namely, Smt. Premawati W/o Sukha (ii) Gopi, Panch, Ward No. 3 and (iii) Swaroop Singh, Panch, Ward No.9 had incurred di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document