P.P.NAOLEKAR, P.C.JAIN, V.S.KOKJE
Stanely D. Crooze – Appellant
Versus
Kamini D. Crooze – Respondent
(2). The parties who profess Christianity were married on 23.7.1990 at Ajmer. They lived together for some time but ultimately on 28.7.1991, according to the pe- titioner husband, she left the matrimonial home. The petitioner further alleged that on searching the luggage left by the respondent wife some objectionable correspondence and photographs were discovered. The petitioner came to know from the correspondence and photographs that his wife respondent No. 1 was carrying on immoral affair with respondent No. 2, one Shri Sunil Goyal. He, therefore, sought a divorce on the ground of adultry committed by the wife. In reply to the petition, the wife respondent No. 1 denied having committed adultry but put forward a claim for divorce on her own grounds. She alleged that the petitioner was not behaving properly with her. He used to get drunk and used to assault her. Respondent No. 2 Sunil Goyal did not participate in the proceedings and the proceedings went on ex- parte against him. Petitioner Stanely D. Crooze examined
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.