(2). These two appeals are filed by the State of Rajasthan and Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu, aggrieved by the common judgment and order dated, 1.12.98 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 4726 and Writ Petition No. 5086/98 by which aforementioned circular dated, 19.8.98 was quashed by the learned Single Judge, allowing the said writ petitions.

(3). For convenience, in this judgment, we shall refer to the parties as they were arrayed in the writ petitions.

(4). The petitioners in the writ petitions sought for a declaration that the impugned Circular dated, 19.8.98 as illegal and arbitrary, the same be quashed and that the respondents be directed to consider the petitioners to be eligible for appoi- ntment on the post of Primary School Teacher in terms of the Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Rules, 1996. The further prayer was to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners on the post of Primary School Teachers in terms of the Advertisement dated, 16.6.98 in order of their merits.

(5). The Circular dated, 19.8.98, the validly of which is called in question in the writ petitions reads thus:

jktLFkku ljdkj

xzkeh.k fodkl ,oa iapk;rh jkt foHkkx

Øekd % 139¼14-2½xzkfoi@fk{kk@fu;qfDr@96@1350 t;iqj fn- 19-8-98

eq[; dk;Zdkjh vf/kdkjh ,oa lfpo

ftyk ifj"kn ¼leLr½

fo"k; % lhfu;j lSds.Mjh ¼O;klokf;d½ ijh{kk] lhfu;j lSds- ¼vdknfed½ ijh{kk ds led{k u gksus ds ckj esaA

mijksDr fo"k; esa ys[k gS fd ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk xbZ fuf.kZr fd;k x;k gS fd lhfu;j lSds.Mjh ¼O;kolkf;d½ ijh{kk] lhfu;j lSdS.Mjh ¼vdknfed½ ijh{kk ds led{k ugha gSA foHkkx }kjk fof/k foHkkx dh jk; izkIr djds ;g fu.kZ; fy;k x;k gS fd o"kZ 1998-99 esa r`rh; Js.kh v/;kidksa dh fu;qfDr gsrq tks foKkiu tkjh fd;k x;k gS] mlds vUrxZr izkIr vkosnu i=ksa esa lhfu;j lSdS.Mjh ¼O;kolkf;d½ dks lhfu;j lSdS.Mjh ¼vdknfed½ os led{k ugha ekuk tkos rkfd fdlh rjg ds fookn mRiUu u gksA

bl vknsk dh dM+kbZ ls ikyuk dh tkosA

g-@&

funskd ,oa fofk"B kklu lfpo

xzkeh.k fodkl ,oa iapk;rh jkt foHkkx]

jkt- t;iqjA

The English translation of the same is as follows:

``GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN

RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT.

S.N.F. 139(14-2) GVP/Edu./Appointment/96/1350

Jaipur dt. 19.8.98

Chief Executive Officer and Secretary,

Zila Parishad (All.)

Subject : Regarding Senior Secondary (Vocational) Examination be- ing not treated as equivalent to Senior Secondary (Academic) Examination.

On the above subject since this decision has been taken by the Honble High Court that Senior Secondary (Vocational) Examination is not equivalent to Senior Secondary (Academic) Examination. The- refore, after having consultations with Law Department, this has been decided by the Department that while scrutinising the applications which have been received in pursuance to advertisement issued for appointment of III grade teachers, Sr. Secondary (Vocational) Examination may not be treated as equivalent to Senior Secondary (Acade- mic) Examination so that no controversy of any kind may arise in the matter.

This order may be strictly followed.

sd/-

Director and Special Secretary

Rural Development and Panchayati

Raj Department, Raj. Jaipur.

(6). Briefly stated, the facts as can be gathered from the writ petitions and leading to the filing of these appeals are the following:

(7). The petitioners qualified their Secondary, Sr. Secondary (Vocational) and thereafter, B.S.T.C. Course and became eligible for appointment for the post of Primary School Teacher under the Rajasthan Panchayat Raj Rules, 1996 (for short the Rules). The petitioners fulfilled the eligibility conditions as per Rules 266, but the respondents are not considering them to be eligible on th