Honble SINGH, J.– Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2). This revision petition is directed against the order dated 7.5.1999 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Pali in civil original suit No. 103/93.

(3). By the impugned order, the learned Civil Judge allowed the plaintiff to produce a receipt book for the purpose of cross- examination during the examination of Jetha Ram DW-1.

(4). A perusal of the order dated 7.5.1999 shows that during the examination of Jetha Ram DW-1(defendant), the plaintiff produced the receipt book for the purpose of cross-examination of Jetha Ram. An objection was raised on behalf of the defendant- petitioner that the plaintiff did not produce the receipt-book earlier in spite of the same being in his possession and, therefore, the plaintiff should not be permitted to produce the receipt book in court for the purpose of cross-examination of the defendant Jetha Ram. The argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner (defendant) was based on the provisions contained in Order 7, Rule 18 C.P.C. Order 7 Rule 14 was also referred to the learned Civil Judge who after hearing the parties over-ruled the objecti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document